Legal Opinion
Stambaugh v. Stambaugh (In re Stambaugh)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 14, 2015No. Case Number: 1-12-bk-07007 RNO; Adversary No: 1-14-ap-00246 RNOPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION1
Robert N. Opel, II, Bankruptcy Judge
A Motion to Dismiss the original Complaint in this non-dischargeability action was previously granted, with leave to amend. The Plaintiffs/Creditors timely filed an Amended Complaint which the Debtor moved to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, I will grant the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, but allow twenty-one days to file an amended complaint which conforms with this Opinion.
I. Jurisdiction
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 167(b)(2)®.
II.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chi. Title Ins. Co. v. Mazik (In re Mazik)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- POTTER v. NEWKIRKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020