Legal Opinion

Malcolm v. City of East Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1989No. Docket 107182PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, City of East Detroit, appeals as of right from the jury award of $500,000 in favor of plaintiffs and the trial court’s denial of its motions for summary disposition, a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiffs cross appeal from the trial court’s order granting a directed verdict in favor of codefendant Joseph Croff. We affirm.

On May 12, 1984, while having dinner, plaintiff William Malcolm collapsed due to an apparent heart attack. In response to a call from plaintiffs wife, Cynthia Malcolm, the city’s Emergency Medical Services dispatched two fire…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Burnett v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bouwman v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Richards v. PierceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Association Research and Development Corporation v. CNA Financial Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. City of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Pawlak v. Redox Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Ballard v. Ypsilanti TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cloverdale Equipment Co. v. Manitowoc Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. In Re Air Crash at Detroit Metropolitan AirportDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API