Legal Opinion

Pistel v. Imperial Mutual Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 20, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas (Harlan, C. J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

The declaration filed by the appellants against the appellee contains eight counts — the first six being the *557common counts and the other two on instruments under seal. There was no demurrer filed to the whole declaration on account of the misjoinder of actions, but there was a demurrer to the seventh count which the court sustained and the parties went to trial on the others, which resulted in a verdict for the defendant. Judgment having been entered, the plaintiffs appealed and the only question before us is the ruling of the Court on that demurrer. The first objection to this count urged at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Salinas v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Crooker v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875
  3. Mitchell v. ClayTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Works v. HersheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Veasey v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Latrobe and Whistler v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. Blenard v. BlenardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. McCrillis v. L. Q. White Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Dille v. LongwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Archway Motors, Inc. v. EdelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API