Legal Opinion

Potter v. City of Lacey

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 5, 2021No. 3:20-cv-05925Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 JACK POTTER, CASE NO. 3:20-5925 RJB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING 12 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, IN 13 CITY OF LACEY and KEN SEMKO, PART, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 14 Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 17 8) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 16). Plaintiff, who lives in a travel trailer 18 attached to his truck, challenges two provisions of the Lacey Municipal Code (“LMC”). He 19…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API