Legal Opinion

State v. Blankenship

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1996No. 1995-1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 522.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BLANKENSHIP, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Blankenship,

1996-Ohio-58.] Appellate procedure—Application for reopening appeal from judgment and conviction based on claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel— Application denied when no genuine issue whether applicant was deprived of effective assistance of appellate counsel is present. (No. 95-1923—Submitted November 14, 1995—Decided February 14, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA94-05-118.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BlankenshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. MoaningOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BlankenshipOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Richardson, Unpublished Decision (1-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API