Legal Opinion

Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Kratzer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1930No. 5104PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Action by defendant in error, Kratzer, herein called plaintiff, to recover damages of plaintiff in error, the Norfolk & Western Railway Company, herein called defendant, for personal injuries. The suit was brought under the Ohio Railroad Employers’ Liability Act (Ohio Gen. Code, § 9017, subd. 2). The only question is whether the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

The main line of defendant’s road runs almost east and west through Winchester. The track is straight and crosses at least three streets of the village. The depot is on the south…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MihasSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Connelley v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sinram v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. Karr v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Kurn v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. Angst v. Great Northern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
  5. Emch v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API