Legal Opinion

Tackett v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 12, 1936No. 9646PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

R. O. Tackett and J. B. and W. S. Cunningham, a. partnership, operated a cotton business, with offices at Taft and Corpus Christi, under the trade-name of- “Tackett and Cunningham, Cotton.”

On December 14, 1931, the partnership was dissolved by mutual consent, evidenced by four certain contemporaneous written instruments, including a promissory note for $1,900, executed by Tackett, in behalf of the partnership, and by the two Cun-ninghams, payable to Tackett, individually, on or before December 14, 1932.

The partnership had an existing deposit account in the City National…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bros. v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. BrassTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Urso v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Wheeler v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Warner v. Venture Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Benson v. MeachamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Foster v. BullardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API