Legal Opinion

Bros. v. Patton

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1927No. 706—3929PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeee, J.

Defendants in error have been granted permission to file their second motion for rehearing, the ground for such leave being “that neither of the points adverted to in our second motion has been discussed in the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, * * * for, certainly, every litigant is entitled to have the court reduce to writing its reasons for holding against him.” The points adverted to in the second motion are two in number, and the same points were *538made in the first motion for rehearing, which was overruled. No written opinion was filed on such rehearing as to these points, for it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. Nalle & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Fenley v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Neff v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Farrier v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API