Legal Opinion

Porchey v. Kelling

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 5, 1945No. 39288PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cast on demurrer to his third amended petition nisi, plaintiff appeals. Otto Porchey instituted the action as guardian of Dean Porchey, a person of unsound mind (for convenience referred to as plaintiff), against Al E. Kelling and The National Refining Company, a corporation, for $75,000 damages on account of injuries suffered by his ward when he fell into one of the grease pits on premises owned by said corporation and operated by said Kelling as a gasoline and oil service station. The question is whether defendants are liable. The extent of the injuries are not determinative. The material…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Ilgenfritz v. Missouri Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Eppstein v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. Holmes v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CinnamonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Boyer v. Guidicy Marble, Terrazzo & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Anderson v. WeltyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Gruetzemacher v. BillingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Wells v. Henry W. Kuhs Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API