Legal Opinion
Wichansky v. Wichansky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 15, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
126 N.J. Super. 156 (1973)
313 A.2d 222
BARRY E. WICHANSKY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOYCE M. WICHANSKY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided November 15, 1973.
Mr. Clifford Herbstman for plaintiff.
Mr. R.M. James Ruscick for defendant.
Mr. Leon Wilson represented New Jersey Psychological Ass'n, amicus curiae.
Mr. Martin M. Friedman, for Dr. Daniel Sugarman; Mr. Kenneth L. Abrams, on the brief.
McKENZIE, J.C.C., Temporarily Assigned.
The parties to this matrimonial action obtained marriage counseling together from Dr. Daniel H. Sugarman, a licensed psychologist. He has been subpoenaed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the City Clerk of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
- RITT v. RittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Ritt v. RittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kinsella v. KinsellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. RomaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Ziemann v. Burlington County Bridge CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Fitzgibbon v. FitzgibbonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- M. v. K.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.