Legal Opinion
State v. Roma
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 17, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
140 N.J. Super. 582 (1976)
357 A.2d 45
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THOMAS ROMA, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal).
Decided March 17, 1976.
Messrs. Shanley & Fisher, attorneys for Roland Reed, Ph.D. (Mr. Patrick Silva, appearing).
Messrs. Farber, Hughes & Krause, attorneys for defendant (Mr. John J. Hughes, appearing).
Mr. James T. O'Halloran, Hudson County Prosecutor, for the State. (Mr. William T. Petrina, Assistant Prosecutor, appearing).
YOUNG, J.C.C. Temporarily Assigned.
Should the statutory privilege granted marriage counselors be recognized when interposed in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Myron FarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- State v. VaronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Ziemann v. Burlington County Bridge CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Fitzgibbon v. FitzgibbonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- M. v. K.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.