Legal Opinion

People v. Richards

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1929No. Docket No. 119, Calendar No. 34,221PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I am constrained to disagree with the conclusion reached by Mr. Justice FELLOWS.

The right of an accused to be tried in the jurisdiction where it is alleged he committed crime is ancient and valuable and should be maintained. But, in case of escape of a prisoner, in confinement under sentence to a State prison, is the mere place of the act to fix the venue or may the act itself, in its relation to the imprisonment, be declared by law to fix the venue? In order to be guilty of an escape, a prisoner need not break doors or walls; he escapes if he removes himself from the imposed restraint over…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradford v. GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. VanderburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. William L. ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. People v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. KigginsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. SouthwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API