Legal Opinion

People v. Vanderburg

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1924No. Crim. No. 750PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEYAND, J., pro tem.

The defendant, a prisoner regularly confined within the state prison, at Folsom, California, was, while serving his term of imprisonment, taken from said prison to the county of Trinity to work in road construction in that county, and while there he escaped from the surveillance of the prison guards. He was convicted of the offense and prosecutes this appeal.

The notice of appeal states that the appeal is taken from the final judgment of conviction and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The grounds of the motion for a new trial do not appear. However,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bradford v. GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. People v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Patricia J. v. Rio Linda Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API