Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. Prescott

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 5, 2013No. 2013-C-0669Published

1Dissent

KNOLL, J,

dissenting.

hi respectfully dissent from the majority’s recall of this writ grant, as I find defendant, Elmer E. Prescott, breached his duty of care as a fiduciary. As an independent executor for the estate of Edward Thomas Davis, Prescott failed to inform the legatees of his execution of a three-year mineral lease with AIX Energy on succession property in Claiborne Parish. Because of this failure, one of the legatees, Steven M. Davis, sold his 1/5 interest in the property for substantially less than it was worth.

Despite Article 3396.15’s significant relaxation of the |2procedural…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLPSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  4. Jenkins v. StarnsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  5. Novelaire Technologies, LLC v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API