Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Corse
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 9, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
S. Samuel Di Falco, S.
The court holds that the evidence is entirely insufficient to establish that the respondents have title to the moneys sought to be recovered in this discovery proceeding. The respondents are two practical nurses who were employed by the decedent. Each claims that the decedent made gifts of the proceeds of his savings bank accounts to each of them in equal amounts on 11 different occasions between the period beginning about October 30,1957 and ending January 7, 1958. The amounts alleged to have been received by them were substantial. The decedent died on January 27,1958.
Up…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Ward v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Allen v. . La VaudNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In re the Estate of McCarthyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of SchroederAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hazel v. SaccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Gordon v. Bialystoker Center & Bikur Cholim, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977