Legal Opinion
Hazel v. Sacco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 21, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The evidence at trial disclosed that Edna Gielow is a frail, elderly confused lady suffering from chronic brain syndrome requiring constant care and supervision. From May 6, 1972 to October 3, 1973 defendant Isabella Joan Sacco, an employee of defendant Homemakers of Western New York, Inc. (Homemakers) served as nurse’s aide and companion to Miss Gielow. Plaintiff Margaret Hazel, a court-appointed conservator for Miss Gielow, seeks the return of money allegedly given to Mrs. Sacco by Miss…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Oltarsh v. Aetna InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Reoux v. ReouxNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Reoux v. ReouxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Mendelow v. SlabodkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re Christine D.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lanera v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Werder v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985