Legal Opinion
Jaroslawicz v. Engelhard Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 30, 1989No. Civ. 84-3641 (CSF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.
Defendants were or are closely involved with Engelhard Corporation (“Engel-hard”), 1 a concern engaged in a multitude of manufacturing activities which include the refining of gold, silver and platinum from both raw ore and metal scrap. On April 5, 1984, Engelhard publicly recognized a loss of roughly thirty-five million dollars at its metal refining facilities in Newark, New Jersey, and at Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Thereafter the value of Engelhard stock dropped appreciably and diminished the value of shares owned by plaintiff, Moses…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kriendler v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Voit v. Wonderware Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BollaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Jaroslawicz v. Engelhard Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- In Re the Loewen Group Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.