Legal Opinion

Gerritsen v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1931No. 23150. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery of damages for personal injuries suffered by Mm alleged as the result of the negligence of the defendants city and Seattle school district No. 1, as follows:

“That on the 4th day of October, 1929, plaintiff was riding a motorcycle, and coming down along East Union street going in a westerly direction, the plaintiff being on the north side of East Union street, that being the right-hand side of the said East Union street for traffic in a westerly direction. That he was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. City of Anderson v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Brobston v. Darby BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Simon v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Greene v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Johns v. HakeWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Anthony v. CovingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Holmquist v. Queen City Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Crowley v. City of RaymondWashington Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API