Legal Opinion
People v. Tillman
Auburn City Court
Decided January 4, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael F. McKeon, J.
Defendant by way of omnibus motion seeks dismissal of two accusatory instruments charging him with resisting arrest and obstructing governmental administration on the ground that the informations are insufficient pursuant to CPL 170.35. At oral argument and in his answering papers, Assistant District *21Attorney Michael Bass candidly acknowledges the deficiencies contained in the resisting arrest information and consents to a dismissal.
Turning to the obstructing governmental administration charge, defendant argues that the information is deficient in that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Matter of Davan L.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. OffenCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1978
- People v. SimonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Uzoukwu v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- People v. FerreiraCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
- People v. BryanPoughkeepsie City Court · 2002
- Medina v. City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Uzoukwu v. KrawieckiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015