Legal Opinion

Interstate Lumber Co. v. Loop Building Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1929No. Docket No. 3716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDANIEL, J., pro tem.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff (hereinafter called the Lumber Company) and against the defendant Loop Building Company (hereinafter called the Building Company) in the sum of $1,470.85, together with interest at seven per cent per annum from the twenty-seventh day of April, 1922, and costs of suit taxed in the sum of $17.50.

The record is here on a bill of exceptions. The pleadings upon which the suit was tried were the complaint, answer, cross-complaint, and answer to the cross-complaint.

The plaintiff instituted the proceedings to foreclose…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Wolfsen v. SmyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Loop Building Co. v. DecooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Koch v. SumnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hough v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loop Building Co. v. DecooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Pacific Palisades Assn. v. MenningerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API