Runkle v. Gates
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
Peter, John, Michael, and Jane Runkle sued Mary E. Runkle and others, for partition. The complaint charges that one John Runkle died in the year 1846, leaving, in addition to the plaintiffs, Abram, Mary, Patsy, Man*96uel, Lewis, Diana, and James Runkle, his children and heirs at law; that James Runkle has since died, leaving Mary E. Runkle, his only child, and Martha Runkle, his widow, who is now intermarried with Samuel Gates; and that John Runkle died intestate, leaving, however, a pretended will, which, on its face, purports to devise all his real estate (describing it) to his son, James…
2Cited by23 opinions
- McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Dreyer v. SchrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Willett v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Woodfill v. PattonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Davis v. FogleIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.