Woodfill v. Patton
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Jefferson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
Appellants, by their complaint, affirmed that a will executed by Daniel Woodfill had been revoked ; this, the appellees by their answers, denied. Upon this issue the case was tried. A special finding of facts was made and conclusions of law stated. The case comes to this court upon the exceptions to the conclusions of law stated by the trial court.
The material facts are substantially these : Daniel Wood-fill, then a widower with five children, executed a will on the 2d day of March, 1869, and gave it to his son Clarence for safe-keeping. Clarence then lived with his father, on what was called…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kealing v. VansickleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Locke v. Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Runkle v. GatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Davis v. FranklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Tousey v. LockwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- McCague v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Sellards v. KirbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- In re the Application for the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of ParsonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1922
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.