Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Richardson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1999PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

A jury convicted the defendant, Heath Richardson, of murder in the first degree on the theory of deliberate premeditation. The defendant appeals, arguing that the judge erred in denying his request for a missing witness instruction and by instructing the jurors that they had to consider murder in the second degree before considering murder in the first degree. We affirm the conviction. We decline to exercise our power under G. L. c. 278, § 33E, in favor of the defendant.

The jury could have found the facts to be as follows. The victim, Jamal Graham, was at a barbecue at a friend’s house. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. SamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. SCHATVENMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. PauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. SmileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. RedmondMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API