Legal Opinion

Burrows v. Burrows

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1890No. 12885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gibson, C.

The parties to this suit are the owners of and cultivate separate farms in Monterey County, lying upon and embracing a natural stream known as Muddy Creek and flowing into Clear Creek, which has its source easterly of their farms, and when running flows in a westerly direction, first through the land of respondent Olds, next through that of respondent Burrows, and then through the land of appellant. During the winter and spring of each year, and in times of great freshets, it flows in a large stream down to and across the lands of appellant, but in the summer and during dry seasons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Necochea v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TintingerMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Morris v. BeanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1906
  3. Town of Antioch v. Williams Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wells v. MantesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API