Commonwealth v. Enders
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
These unconsolidated appeals arise from the judgments of sentence entered after a jury trial at which all appellants, Jason L. Enders, Scott Francis Liptak, Alexander 0. Stein-berg and Daniel Nelson, were convicted of false imprison ment. 1 The charges stemmed from appellants’ participation in a satanic cult ritual. After all appellants’ post-verdict motions were denied, sentences were imposed. 2 It is from these sentences that the instant appeals are taken.
Appellants, collectively and individually, raise four (4) issues for our consideration. Generally, it is alleged that:…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. UlatoskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DiStefanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. KimSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. DaysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. Derby, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.