Boaz v. Harris

Charles H. Harris, plaintiff below, instituted this suit against Z. Boaz, defendant below, to recover an unpaid balance of $800 alleged to be due on the purchase price of 33 head of bulls sold and delivered by him to appellant, Z. Boaz. Plaintiff alleged that the contract of sale was that the defendant should pay $150 per head for the first 20 bulls and $100 per head for the remaining number.

The defendant answered by a general denial. The testimony of the plaintiff was in accord with his allegations; that of the defendant was to the effect that the contract price agreed upon was that he…