Legal Opinion
In Re Auction Houses Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 12, 2001No. 00 CIV. 0648(LAK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION (corrected)
KAPLAN, District Judge.
The background of this action is amply set forth in previous opinions, familiarity with which is assumed. 1 On February 22, 2001, this Court granted final approval to the proposed settlement of these actions for more than $512 million subject to the conditions that the parties amend (1) “[t]he settlement documents to conform the releases to the requirements of [the Court’s] opinion,” and (2) other settlement documents to contain provisions satisfactory to the Court “to maximize the value of the certificates, the prospects for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. CoyneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap as v. HeereMac VofCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- In re Auction Houses Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In re Auction Houses Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- True v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Kruman v. Christie's International PlcCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- In Re Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Kruman v. Christie's International PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002