Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1982No. 81-1899, CA A23916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for second degree burglary. We address only the third assignment of error. 1

Defendant was ordered to pay $40 restitution to the store owner, whose door he damaged and from whom he stole three jugs of wine, and to pay costs of $270 for court-appointed attorney fees. Defendant’s presentence report indicates that he is “deficient in employment skills, reading and writing ability, and any other applicable skills that could make him a competitor on today’s job market.” He was 21 at the time of sentencing. He had dropped out of high school. He earns a $106 per month…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. AgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. NormileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State v. SchedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. ElwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Steffans v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API