State v. Elwood
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of criminal mischief. He assigns error to the trial court’s subsequent refusal to permit him to withdraw his guilty pleas. This court has no authority to consider defendant’s contentions in this regard on direct appeal. ORS 138.050; State v. Clevenger, 64 Or App 183, 667 P2d 9 (1983); see also State v. Lugo, 48 Or App 919, 618 P2d 986 (1980); State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970); but see State v. Cornelius, 249 Or 454, 438 P2d 1020 (1968). Defendant’s remedy, if any, lies in post-conviction relief.
Defendant contends, in the alternative, that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SlopakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. CorneliusOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ClevengerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. LugoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. ElwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984