Sandoval v. Randolph
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District, in and for the County of Santa Cruz. Frederick S. Nave, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.
— An action was brought in the district court of Santa Cruz county by the appellee against the appellants for a sum of money alleged to have been paid by the appellee and his assignor, L. Lindsay, to the appellants, for the purchase of the San Francisco mine, in the state of Sonora, Republic of Mexico, by the appellants as the agents of the appellee and his assignor, Lindsay. From a decision for the plaintiff, the defendants appealed.
The facts found by the trial court, before whom the case was tried without a jury, are as follows': “In or about the spring of 1905 the defendants A. Sandoval…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mitchell v. HarmonySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- McKenna v. FiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- United States v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. NewcombArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Smith v. PinnerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. United Eastern Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Stark v. StarkArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Hall v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.