Legal Opinion

Metzger v. Knox

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion by the plaintiff for the appointment of a receiver and a temporary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Cbáne, J.

This application is made by the plaintiff for the appointment of a temporary receiver of the Knox Hat Manufacturing Company and for an injunction restraining the E. M. Knox Retail Hat Company from using the Knox trade mark on certain goods sold by it. The principal •grounds upon which the plaintiff moves for this immediate relief are:

First, the continuing breach of contract contained in the bill of sale of the manufacturing business from E. M. Knox to the Knox Hat Manufacturing Company. Second, the waste of funds due to the improper payment to the president of the Knox Manufacturing…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Giordano v. Dellwood Dairy Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Valente v. ShumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Resnick v. Karmax Camp Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Metzger v. KnoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API