Legal Opinion

State v. State Journal Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1906No. 13,833PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original action for damages for breach of contract. Defendant demurred.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, C. J.

When the ruling upon the second demurrer was sustained for the reasons stated in the opinion, 75 Neb. 275, a motion for a new trial was filed, this being an action brought originally in this court. Upon this motion the attorney general filed an able and exhaustive brief. The propositions of law advanced by him as showing that our former decision Avas Avrong are vigorously supported both in his brief and upon the oral argument. Many decisions of other courts, both in this country and England, are cited and discussed with earnestness and ability. It became very manifest that, Avhatever might be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corliss v. E. W. Walker Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1894
  2. Corliss v. E. W. Walker Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1893
  3. Cottom v. HollidayIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Pulcifer v. PageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
  5. State v. State Journal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Caldwell v. Lincoln Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lyman v. DunnNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Schepers v. LautenschlagerNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ericson v. Nebraska-Iowa Farm Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Meier v. NelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API