Legal Opinion

People v. Walden

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2002No. 90976PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The issue presented is whether the 15-year sentencing enhancement for armed robbery while in possession of a firearm (720 ILCS 5/18 — 2(a)(2), (b) (West 2000)) is valid and enforceable. We hold that it is not.

BACKGROUND

Defendant, David Walden, was charged by information with one count of armed robbery while in possession of a firearm (720 ILCS 5/18 — 2(a)(2) (West 2000)). Although armed robbery is classified generally as a Class X felony, subsection (b) of the armed robbery statute provides that, for armed robberies while in possession of a firearm, “15 years shall be added to the term of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. MalchowIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. K.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. LombardiIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. SharpeIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. MossIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. HauschildIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. City of Chicago v. HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 2013

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API