People v. Walden
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
The issue presented is whether the 15-year sentencing enhancement for armed robbery while in possession of a firearm (720 ILCS 5/18 — 2(a)(2), (b) (West 2000)) is valid and enforceable. We hold that it is not.
BACKGROUND
Defendant, David Walden, was charged by information with one count of armed robbery while in possession of a firearm (720 ILCS 5/18 — 2(a)(2) (West 2000)). Although armed robbery is classified generally as a Class X felony, subsection (b) of the armed robbery statute provides that, for armed robberies while in possession of a firearm, “15 years shall be added to the term of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. MalchowIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. K.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. LombardiIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- People v. SharpeIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. MossIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. HauschildIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Chicago v. HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.