Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Holland

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2003No. 90585PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rarick

In 1995 the General Assembly amended section 3 — 1 of the Illinois State Auditing Act (Auditing Act) (30 ILCS 5/3 — 1 (West 2000)) to include a provision directing the Auditor General of the State of Illinois to conduct a compliance and management audit of the City of Chicago (City) and any other entity regarding the operation of O’Hare International Airport (O’Hare), Midway Airport (Midway), and Merrill C. Meigs Field (Meigs) (collectively, the airports). When the Auditor General attempted perform an audit under authority of that amendment, the City sought declaratory and injunctive relief…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Material Service Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Land v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Arangold Corp. v. ZehnderIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bell v. Louisville & NashVille RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Russell v. Department of Natural ResourcesIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Northern Illinois Emergency Physicians v. Landau, Omahana & Kopka, Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Alpha School Bus Co., Inc. v. WagnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Kostal v. Pinkus Dermatopathology Laboratory, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Quad Cities Open, Inc. v. City of SilvisIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Seith v. Chicago Sun-Times, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API