State v. Broms
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was accused of violation of the ordinance of Minneapolis prohibiting disorderly conduct, tried in the municipal court of that city before Charles L. Smith, J., found guilty, and sentenced to hard labor in the workhouse of Minneapolis for 90 days. From the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The charge was: “That at and within the corporate limits of Minneapolis, on the 13th day of September, 1917, the defendant then and *403there being, did wilfully, wrongfully and unlawfully make, aid, countenance and assist in making a noise, riot, and disturbance and improper diversion in a public place, and did collect with bodies and crowds for unlawful purposes, to the annoyance and disturbance of the citizens and travelers then and there being and passing, contrary to the provisions of an ordinance” of said city. The trial resulted in a conviction. Defendant moved for a new trial and appeals…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. . MostNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- City of Mankato v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Commonwealth v. OaksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- People v. BurmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State v. HobenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Connolly v. ParksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- City of Red Wing v. NibbeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936