State v. Davis

I. M. Olsen, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of disorderly conduct by the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, under an ordinance of that city, and appeals from the judgment.

Defendant alleges errors as follows: (1) That the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction; (2) that the defendant did not have a fair trial because of bias and prejudice of the court; (3) that the ordinance is unconstitutional.

The evidence shows that the defendant was one of the leaders in staging, conducting, and continuing a noisy and disorderly demonstration on the streets of the city of Minneapolis…