Legal Opinion
In Re Driscoll
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 18, 1995No. 19-30733PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELIZABETH L. PERRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
The trustee objects to the debtor’s claim of exemption in a 1990 Lexus automobile under ORS 23.160(l)(h). The objection to the exemption will be sustained for the reasons that follow.
BACKGROUND FACTS
Prior to August of 1990, the debtors owned a 1990 Lexus LS 400 automobile. In August of 1990, the debtor Robert Driscoll (“debtor”) lost his right foot. Between August and October of 1990, the debtor discussed with an occupational therapist the following three options for the debtor’s operation of a motor vehicle, given the limitations caused…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lindsay v. U.S. Bank (In Re Lindsay)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re KirbyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
- In Re ManUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- In Re McCashenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- In Re HellenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- In Re AllardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.