Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. First Security Bank
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 30, 1971No. 71-1135PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
On the application of the Securities and Exchange Commission the district *167court directed enforcement of four subpoenas duces tecum issued in a Commission investigation of possible violations of the federal securities laws. The subpoenas seek production of certain records of the First Security Bank of Utah, N.A., and of the Murray State Bank. The banks do not oppose the Commission’s application for subpoena enforcement. Certain depositors who maintain accounts in the banks sought to prevent compliance by the banks and were permitted to intervene. The appeal is by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arthur Young & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- In Re a Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- United States v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,853 Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. v. United States Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.