Legal Opinion
King v. City of Bainbridge
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 10, 2003No. S02A1685Published
1Opinion of the Court
577 S.E.2d 772 (2003)
276 Ga. 484
KING
v.
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE.
No. S02A1685.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
March 10, 2003.
Reconsideration Denied April 11, 2003.
Gilbert J. Murrah, Bainbridge, for appellant.
Kirbo & Kendrick, Bruce W. Kirbo, Bainbridge, for appellee.
FLETCHER, Chief Justice.
The City of Bainbridge filed suit against Ethel King to enforce its zoning ordinance that precluded her placement of a mobile home in an R-2 residential district. King contended that the City's zoning ordinance was unconstitutional and that it was preempted by federal law. The trial court rejected these arguments and King…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hunter v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Brookside Village v. ComeauTexas Supreme Court · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.