Legal Opinion

Volz v. Peterson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2003No. 20030067PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] LeAnn Volz appealed from an order denying her motion to modify the custody provisions of a divorce decree. We reverse and remand, concluding the trial court erred in determining LeAnn had failed to establish a prima facie case entitling her to an evidentiary hearing under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(4).

I

[¶ 2] LeAnn Volz and Bradley Peterson were divorced in 1998. The divorce judgment, which was based upon the parties’ stipulation, provided for “joini/split custody” of the parties’ three minor children. The children rotate between LeAnn’s and Bradley’s homes every two weeks.

[¶…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mosbrucker v. MosbruckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Alvarez v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gietzen v. GietzenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Quarne v. QuarneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tank v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Mock v. MockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dietz v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Clark v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API