Legal Opinion

Nicewicz v. Nicewicz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 5, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The plaintiff claimed and offered evidence to prove: The plaintiff and defendant are husband and wife. On account of an estrangement between them, the plaintiff gave to his wife, the defendant, a deed of conveyance of his interest in their dwelling-place, and in consideration thereof she gave a note, secured by a mortgage upon these premises, to the plaintiff. They continued to live in this house for some months, but separately, in separate rooms, and the defendant during this time managed the property and treated it as her own, and from the date of the conveyance the plaintiff had, at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drazen v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Johnson v. ShufordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Church v. SpicerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  4. Shmilovitz v. BaresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Quednau v. LangrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. Marko v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. State v. Van AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. Taft v. Valley Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Marko v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API