Legal Opinion
Groundwater Appropriators of South Platte River Basin, Inc. v. City of Boulder
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 30, 2003No. 02SA249PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats
The Groundwater Appropriators of the South Platte River Basin, Inc. (GASP) appealed fromm the water court's order imposing attorney fees as a condition for granting GASP's motion to dismiss two of its applications for conditional water rights. Opposers Ft. Morgan Reservoir and Irrigation and Jackson Lake Reservoir and Irrigation Companies cross-appealed from the water court's refusal to consider their motion to enjoin out-of-priority pumping by GASP members, in which the City of Boulder had joined at trial. Because C.R.C.P. 41(a)(2) does not authorize the imposition of attorney fees as terms…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Milton Lecompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Larry McCall Cross-Appellant v. Gayle Franzen, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. HuizarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Antowyn Cauley v. John WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Well Augmentation Subdistrict of Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. King Consolidated Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- FSDW, LLC v. First Nat. BankColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- City of Englewood v. Burlington Ditch, Reservoir & Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Fort Morgan Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Groundwater Appropriators of the South Platte River Basin, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.