Legal Opinion

Kennard v. Kennard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1935No. 1577PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

The facts in this case are too complicated and the parties and issues too numerous to permit of a statement, within the space usually allotted for that purpose, that would he sufficient to clearly present the case to one not otherwise familiar with the record. We have concluded to make only a brief general statement and then separately discuss the pertinent facts as the issues are disposed of.

G. B. Kennard brought this suit against M. E. Kennard and S. A. Kennard and others to recover on twelve promissory notes aggregating approximately $14,000. It was alleged that M.- E.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cleveland v. ClevelandTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Heidenheimer v. BaumanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Jackson v. TemplinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. Farnum v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurance on Lives & Granting AnnuitiesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Aransas Dock and Channel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. First Methodist Episcopal Church South v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Poole v. StarkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Maxey v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Huffman v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API