Peterson v. Anderson

Anderson brought general assumpsit in August, 1878, to recover among other things for an alleged balance for putting in saw logs, and the jury returned a ver*442diet in his favor for $1116.63. Peterson then brought error on certain exceptions to the proceedings. The record is rendered ambiguous by much unnecessary matter, and by its want of connection and other perplexing defects. Two written contracts are often alluded to as Exhibits “A” and “ B,” and. papers so marked are attached to the bill of exceptions. But it does not distinctly appear that either of them was actually submitted to the…