Legal Opinion

State v. Merchant

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 1, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Eugene Merchant appeals from judgments entered after a jury verdict by the Superior Court (Hancock County, Hjelm, J.), convicting him of gross sexual assault (Class A), in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 25S(1)(A) (Supp.2002); unlawful sexual contact (Class B), in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(H) (Supp.2002); 1 and two counts of kidnapping (Class A), in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 301(1)(A)(3), (4) (1983). 2 Merchant contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the convictions and that the Superior Court erred in: (1) conducting lengthy questioning of jurors after an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  2. State v. ChattleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. In Re Joshua B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. In Re William S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. Brown v. ReedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HodgkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Fortune v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. State of Maine v. Dustin BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. State of Maine v. Jonathan M. CareySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  5. Daniel L. Fortune v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API