Legal Opinion
State v. Hodgkins
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 24, 2003No. OXF-02-413PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
[¶ 1] Stephen Hodgkins appeals from the judgment of conviction for assault (Class D), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207(1) (1983), entered in the District Court (Rumford, McElwee, J.) following a nonjury trial. Hodgkins asserts, among other things, that the court erred as a matter of law when it imposed a two-year period of probation in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1202(1) (1988 & Supp.2002)! We amend the sentence to reflect a one-year period of probation and affirm the conviction.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] The dispute before us arises from an incident involving Stephen Hodgkins and Cathy Lyons, his former…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. BurdickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- United States v. Arturo Daniel Velasco-Heredia, AKA Arturo Velasco-HerediaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- State v. ParkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State v. KeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SchofieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- State v. HoflandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- State v. GrindleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- State v. BriggsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.