Legal Opinion

Castelazo & Associates v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 31, 1995No. Court No. 90-09-00450PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Tsoucalas, Judge:

Plaintiff, Castelazo & Associates, a/c Galaxy Tapes (“Castelazo”), moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of this Court for summary judgment on the grounds that all facts that may be material to the dispositive issues raised in this action are answered in the record and the papers submitted and that Castelazo is entitled to judgment in its favor on those facts and the applicable law.1 Defendant cross-moves *1008for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, seeking an order dismissing this case on grounds that this Court lacks jurisdiction.

Castelazo brought this action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. New Zealand Lamb Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  5. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Castelazo & Associates, A/c Galaxy Tapes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API