City of Marysville v. Pate, Hirn & Bogue, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff, City of Marysville, appeals as of right from a February 20, 1990, order of the St. Clair Circuit Court granting summary disposition to defendant, Pate, Hirn & Bogue, Inc., on the ground that plaintiffs claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. MCR 2.116(C) (7). We reverse the order of the circuit court.
Plaintiff first contends that the two-year discovery rule of Dyke v Richard, 390 Mich 739; 213 NW2d 185 (1973), is the applicable limitation period in this case. Preliminarily, we must determine whether the parties’ prior appeal in this case resolved this issue,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dyke v. RichardMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Locricchio v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Marysville v. Pate, Hirn & Bogue, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Boyer v. VandenbrinkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Goodwin v. SchulteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Forfeiture of $19,250Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Levinson v. TrotskyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Levinson v. TrotskyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Roger Turunen v. Department of Natural resources/directorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.