Legal Opinion

City of Marysville v. Pate, Hirn & Bogue, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1992No. Docket 127058PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, City of Marysville, appeals as of right from a February 20, 1990, order of the St. Clair Circuit Court granting summary disposition to defendant, Pate, Hirn & Bogue, Inc., on the ground that plaintiffs claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. MCR 2.116(C) (7). We reverse the order of the circuit court.

Plaintiff first contends that the two-year discovery rule of Dyke v Richard, 390 Mich 739; 213 NW2d 185 (1973), is the applicable limitation period in this case. Preliminarily, we must determine whether the parties’ prior appeal in this case resolved this issue,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dyke v. RichardMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Locricchio v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of Marysville v. Pate, Hirn & Bogue, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Boyer v. VandenbrinkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Goodwin v. SchulteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Forfeiture of $19,250Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Levinson v. TrotskyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Levinson v. TrotskyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Roger Turunen v. Department of Natural resources/directorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API