Commonwealth v. Mandeville
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This is a complaint for keeping intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same contrary to law. The evidence tended to prove that the defendant “ kept lager beer with intent to sell the same to be used as a beverage, and to be drunk on the premises.” The only exception not waived is to an instruction that “ a license of the sixth class gave the party holding the same the right to keep for sale and to sell intoxicating liquors for three purposes only, namely, medicinal, mechanical, and chemical, and gave the holder no right to keep for sale or to sell intoxicating liquors to be used as a…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CorbettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Commonwealth v. SookeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Commonwealth v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Commonwealth v. FrostMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Commonwealth v. TateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.