Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Regents of the University
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Conway.
This case presents us again with the question of the constitutionality of our motion picture licensing law. Undoubtedly this is often a question of the greatest delicacy. But as we ponder this particular case and what is involved here, we perceive no necessity for apprehension as to the justice or constitutionality of the Board of Regents’ determination to deny a license to this film, “ Lady Chatterley’s Lover ’ ’. This denial was based upon sections 122 and 122-a of the Education Law which require the denial of a license to motion pictures which are immoral in that they…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Regents of the UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Leech v. American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Grove Press, Inc. v. ChristenberryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- Excelsior Pictures Corp. v. City of Chicago, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.